banner



Gtx 580 Sli Vs Gtx 1060

1060 6 GB vs 580

Price now 269$

Games supported 96%

Price now 41$

Games supported 76%

General info

Comparing of graphics card compages, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating 132 298
Value for coin 33.04 2.64
Compages Pascal (2016−2021) Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name GP106 GF110
Market place segment Desktop Desktop
Release appointment xix July 2016 (half-dozen years agone) 9 Nov 2010 (11 years ago)
Launch cost (MSRP) $299 $499
Current cost $269 (0.9x MSRP) $41 (0.1x MSRP)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

Full general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of functioning, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, particularly when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 512
CUDA cores no data 512
Core clock speed 1506 MHz 772 MHz
Heave clock speed 1708 MHz no data
Number of transistors 4,400 one thousand thousand 3,000 1000000
Manufacturing process engineering 16 nm xl nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 120 Watt 244 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature no data 97 °C
Texture fill up rate 136.vii 49.4 billion/sec
Floating-signal performance 4,375 gflops 1,581.1 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing 1. For desktop video cards it'southward interface and coach (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus back up no data PCI-E 2.0 x sixteen
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe two.0 x16
Length 250 mm x.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Peak no data four.376" (111 mm) (xi.i cm)
Width two-slot 2-slot
Supplementary power connectors 1x six-pin One 6-pin and Ane 8-pivot
SLI options no information +

Memory

Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of system RAM.

Retentiveness blazon GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM corporeality 6 GB 1536 MB
Retentiveness bus width 192 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Retentivity bandwidth 192.2 GB/due south 192.iv GB/s
Shared memory - no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself.

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor support no data +
HDMI + +
Maximum VGA resolution no data 2048x1536
G-SYNC support + no data
Audio input for HDMI no information Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will bear witness useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 6.four v.1
OpenGL 4.half dozen 4.2
OpenCL i.2 1.1
Vulkan one.two.131 +
CUDA 6.1 +

Criterion performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we commonly fix bug chop-chop.

GTX 1060 6 GB 34.62

+127%

  • Passmark
  • 3DMark Vantage Operation
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

This is probably the virtually ubiquitous criterion, role of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing 4 separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 6 GB 10252

+127%

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, ane depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1060 vi GB 43717

+99.3%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX xi benchmark past Futuremark. It used 4 tests based on ii scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1060 half-dozen GB 17288

+185%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features ii separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: xiii%

GTX 1060 6 GB 12816

+158%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining operation of GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB and GeForce GTX 580. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 142 Mh/s

Gaming functioning

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set up of popular games across unlike resolutions:

900p no information 53
Full HD 93

−5.four%

98

+5.4%

1200p no data 78
1440p 49 no data
4K 32 no data

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full Hd
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    Loftier Preset
  • Total Hd
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 14−16
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72

+380%

fourteen−sixteen

−380%

Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 35−40

+133%

14−sixteen

−133%

Battlefield 5 106

+607%

14−sixteen

−607%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 78

+420%

14−16

−420%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40

+133%

14−sixteen

−133%

Far Cry v 82

+447%

xiv−sixteen

−447%

Far Weep New Dawn 81

+440%

14−16

−440%

Forza Horizon four 100

+567%

14−sixteen

−567%

Hitman iii 35−40

+133%

fourteen−sixteen

−133%

Horizon Cipher Dawn 35−40

+133%

14−xvi

−133%

Red Dead Redemption 2 56

+273%

xiv−16

−273%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68

+353%

fourteen−xvi

−353%

Sentinel Dogs: Legion 35−forty

+133%

14−16

−133%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61

+307%

14−16

−307%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40

+133%

14−16

−133%

Battlefield 5 86

+473%

xiv−16

−473%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 64

+327%

fourteen−16

−327%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40

+133%

fourteen−16

−133%

Far Cry 5 75

+400%

xiv−xvi

−400%

Far Weep New Dawn 75

+400%

14−16

−400%

Forza Horizon 4 93

+520%

14−16

−520%

Hitman three 35−40

+133%

fourteen−16

−133%

Horizon Aught Dawn 35−40

+133%

14−16

−133%

Metro Exodus 43

+187%

14−xvi

−187%

Red Expressionless Redemption 2 30

+100%

14−16

−100%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58

+287%

14−16

−287%

The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 76

+407%

fourteen−sixteen

−407%

Spotter Dogs: Legion 35−40

+133%

14−16

−133%

Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey 38

+153%

14−sixteen

−153%

Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 35−twoscore

+133%

14−16

−133%

Battleground 5 78

+420%

14−16

−420%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−forty

+133%

14−16

−133%

Far Cry 5 lxx

+367%

14−16

−367%

Far Cry New Dawn 69

+360%

xiv−16

−360%

Forza Horizon 4 73

+387%

14−sixteen

−387%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44

+193%

xiv−16

−193%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

+133%

14−16

−133%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41

+173%

14−16

−173%

Hitman 3 35−40

+133%

fourteen−16

−133%

Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40

+133%

14−sixteen

−133%

Metro Exodus 26

+73.iii%

fourteen−16

−73.iii%

Cerise Dead Redemption two 19

+26.7%

14−16

−26.7%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34

+127%

fourteen−xvi

−127%

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 32

+113%

14−xvi

−113%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40

+133%

fourteen−sixteen

−133%

Battlefield 5 58

+287%

xiv−16

−287%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40

+133%

14−sixteen

−133%

Far Cry 5 47

+213%

14−xvi

−213%

Far Weep New Dawn 50

+233%

14−16

−233%

Forza Horizon four 57

+280%

14−16

−280%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40

+133%

14−16

−133%

Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 22

+46.7%

fourteen−16

−46.vii%

Hitman 3 35−40

+133%

xiv−16

−133%

Horizon Naught Dawn 35−xl

+133%

14−sixteen

−133%

Metro Exodus 16

+six.7%

xiv−xvi

−6.7%

Red Expressionless Redemption 2 12

−25%

14−sixteen

+25%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17

+xiii.iii%

14−xvi

−xiii.3%

The Witcher iii: Wild Chase 29

+93.3%

14−16

−93.3%

Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey 18

+20%

14−xvi

−xx%

Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 35−40

+133%

14−16

−133%

Battleground 5 31

+107%

14−xvi

−107%

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40

+133%

fourteen−sixteen

−133%

Far Cry 5 23

+53.3%

fourteen−16

−53.3%

Far Weep New Dawn 26

+73.3%

14−sixteen

−73.3%

Forza Horizon 4 38

+153%

xiv−16

−153%

Watch Dogs: Legion 35−xl

+133%

14−16

−133%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 34.62 15.24
Novelty nineteen July 2016 9 Nov 2010
Toll $299 $499
Memory passenger vehicle width 192 384
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1280 512
Memory bandwidth 192.two 192.4
Chip lithography sixteen nm 40 nm
Thermal pattern power (TDP) 120 Watt 244 Watt

Judging past the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

since it shows better performance.


Should you yet have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and nosotros shall respond.

Cast your vote

Practise you recollect we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" push button near your favorite graphics menu.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB past AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower past i% and lower past 4 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 six GB 100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 580 past AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 580 from AMD is Radeon R7 370, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower past one position in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 580:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Hither y'all can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well equally rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB on a calibration of one to v:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Hither you can inquire a question well-nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1060-6-GB-vs-GeForce-GTX-580

Posted by: cryersaterring.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Gtx 580 Sli Vs Gtx 1060"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel