Gtx 580 Sli Vs Gtx 1060
1060 6 GB vs 580
Price now 269$
Games supported 96%
Price now 41$
Games supported 76%
General info
Comparing of graphics card compages, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 132 | 298 |
| Value for coin | 33.04 | 2.64 |
| Compages | Pascal (2016−2021) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | GP106 | GF110 |
| Market place segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release appointment | xix July 2016 (half-dozen years agone) | 9 Nov 2010 (11 years ago) |
| Launch cost (MSRP) | $299 | $499 |
| Current cost | $269 (0.9x MSRP) | $41 (0.1x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
Full general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of functioning, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, particularly when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 512 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 772 MHz |
| Heave clock speed | 1708 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,400 one thousand thousand | 3,000 1000000 |
| Manufacturing process engineering | 16 nm | xl nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 244 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 97 °C |
| Texture fill up rate | 136.vii | 49.4 billion/sec |
| Floating-signal performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing 1. For desktop video cards it'southward interface and coach (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus back up | no data | PCI-E 2.0 x sixteen |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe two.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | x.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Peak | no data | four.376" (111 mm) (xi.i cm) |
| Width | two-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x six-pin | One 6-pin and Ane 8-pivot |
| SLI options | no information | + |
Memory
Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of system RAM.
| Retentiveness blazon | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM corporeality | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
| Retentiveness bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
| Retentivity bandwidth | 192.2 GB/due south | 192.iv GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| G-SYNC support | + | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | no information | Internal |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will bear witness useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.four | v.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.half dozen | 4.2 |
| OpenCL | i.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | one.two.131 | + |
| CUDA | 6.1 | + |
Criterion performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we commonly fix bug chop-chop.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Operation
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
This is probably the virtually ubiquitous criterion, role of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing 4 separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, ane depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX xi benchmark past Futuremark. It used 4 tests based on ii scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite existence done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features ii separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: xiii%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining operation of GeForce GTX 1060 half-dozen GB and GeForce GTX 580. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | no data | 142 Mh/s |
Gaming functioning
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set up of popular games across unlike resolutions:
| 900p | no information | 53 |
| Full HD | 93 −5.four% | 98 +5.4% |
| 1200p | no data | 78 |
| 1440p | 49 | no data |
| 4K | 32 | no data |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full Hd
Medium Preset - Full HD
Loftier Preset - Total Hd
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4KHigh Preset
- 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 72 +380% | fourteen−sixteen −380% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla | 35−40 +133% | 14−sixteen −133% |
| Battlefield 5 | 106 +607% | 14−sixteen −607% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 78 +420% | 14−16 −420% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 +133% | 14−sixteen −133% |
| Far Cry v | 82 +447% | xiv−sixteen −447% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 81 +440% | 14−16 −440% |
| Forza Horizon four | 100 +567% | 14−sixteen −567% |
| Hitman iii | 35−40 +133% | fourteen−sixteen −133% |
| Horizon Cipher Dawn | 35−40 +133% | 14−xvi −133% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 56 +273% | xiv−16 −273% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 68 +353% | fourteen−xvi −353% |
| Sentinel Dogs: Legion | 35−forty +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 61 +307% | 14−16 −307% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40 +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Battlefield 5 | 86 +473% | xiv−16 −473% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 64 +327% | fourteen−16 −327% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 +133% | fourteen−16 −133% |
| Far Cry 5 | 75 +400% | xiv−xvi −400% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 75 +400% | 14−16 −400% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 93 +520% | 14−16 −520% |
| Hitman three | 35−40 +133% | fourteen−16 −133% |
| Horizon Aught Dawn | 35−40 +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Metro Exodus | 43 +187% | 14−xvi −187% |
| Red Expressionless Redemption 2 | 30 +100% | 14−16 −100% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 58 +287% | 14−16 −287% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt | 76 +407% | fourteen−sixteen −407% |
| Spotter Dogs: Legion | 35−40 +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey | 38 +153% | 14−sixteen −153% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla | 35−twoscore +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Battleground 5 | 78 +420% | 14−16 −420% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−forty +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Far Cry 5 | lxx +367% | 14−16 −367% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 69 +360% | xiv−16 −360% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 73 +387% | 14−sixteen −387% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 44 +193% | xiv−16 −193% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40 +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 41 +173% | 14−16 −173% |
| Hitman 3 | 35−40 +133% | fourteen−16 −133% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40 +133% | 14−sixteen −133% |
| Metro Exodus | 26 +73.iii% | fourteen−16 −73.iii% |
| Cerise Dead Redemption two | 19 +26.7% | 14−16 −26.7% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 34 +127% | fourteen−xvi −127% |
| Assassin'south Creed Odyssey | 32 +113% | 14−xvi −113% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40 +133% | fourteen−sixteen −133% |
| Battlefield 5 | 58 +287% | xiv−16 −287% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 +133% | 14−sixteen −133% |
| Far Cry 5 | 47 +213% | 14−xvi −213% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 50 +233% | 14−16 −233% |
| Forza Horizon four | 57 +280% | 14−16 −280% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40 +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare | 22 +46.7% | fourteen−16 −46.vii% |
| Hitman 3 | 35−40 +133% | xiv−16 −133% |
| Horizon Naught Dawn | 35−xl +133% | 14−sixteen −133% |
| Metro Exodus | 16 +six.7% | xiv−xvi −6.7% |
| Red Expressionless Redemption 2 | 12 −25% | 14−sixteen +25% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 17 +xiii.iii% | 14−xvi −xiii.3% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Chase | 29 +93.3% | 14−16 −93.3% |
| Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey | 18 +20% | 14−xvi −xx% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla | 35−40 +133% | 14−16 −133% |
| Battleground 5 | 31 +107% | 14−xvi −107% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40 +133% | fourteen−sixteen −133% |
| Far Cry 5 | 23 +53.3% | fourteen−16 −53.3% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 26 +73.3% | 14−sixteen −73.3% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 38 +153% | xiv−16 −153% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−xl +133% | 14−16 −133% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 34.62 | 15.24 |
| Novelty | nineteen July 2016 | 9 Nov 2010 |
| Toll | $299 | $499 |
| Memory passenger vehicle width | 192 | 384 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 512 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.two | 192.4 |
| Chip lithography | sixteen nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal pattern power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 244 Watt |
Judging past the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
since it shows better performance.
Should you yet have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and nosotros shall respond.
Cast your vote
Practise you recollect we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" push button near your favorite graphics menu.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB past AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower past i% and lower past 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 580 past AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 580 from AMD is Radeon R7 370, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower past one position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 580:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Hither y'all can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well equally rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 vi GB on a calibration of one to v:
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Hither you can inquire a question well-nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1060-6-GB-vs-GeForce-GTX-580
Posted by: cryersaterring.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Gtx 580 Sli Vs Gtx 1060"
Post a Comment